>>>Are you sure it shouldn't be "Semper ubi purus sub ubi"? Or is this shorter version the motto of the company where you work?
>>
>>Would that not need to be "Semper ubi puri sub ubi" ?
>
>If we've accepted "ubi" for a verb, grammar is lost already ;).

Of course! BUT a lawyer in germany would press for "Analoge Anwendung" (dunno if "Similar application" is a semi-standard way of argument in american law) of the rule that ending of adjective and noun have to be equal. Ubi interpreted as verb makes it clearly a non-noun[keeping firmly in line of non-sense!], but IAC it has an ending<g>. Sort of duck typing salted with some Catch-22 from legalese...("this rule is meant ONLY for nouns. If there is no noun, any word having an ending can be made subject to this rule")

>>And it's probably just a stopgap for law suits, as suits are often wished for in large corporations.
>
>You mean, "washed" - to be in line with the topic? And to keep irony in line, "washed and ironed"... though I doubt that any kind of suits are washed anymore; they are taken to the cleaners.

No undergarments might translate into automatic sexual harassment risking suits. And to discriminate against such suits is still allowed or is that changing as well ? Or is the only discrimination allowed nowadays the one leading directly into leagal trouble and lawyer fees ?
Does Casual Friday coupled with non-adherence to "Semper ubi puri sub ubi" automatically lead to such suits ?

>
>>[Amazing how senseless the german "version" is, although english and german are quite close language-wise. Makes you understand partly why the navaho coders output in WWII was unbreakable to the Japanese]
>
>You should try learning Hungarian. It's like Forth.

The only time there was a chance I remembered to enjoy in silence