>>>Her current reaction (I'm refering now to this thread's main message) cannot (should not) be regarded as whining. It's a proposal for a better filter system. It's actually quite analytic, and reactions should have been analytic too.
>>
>>You can't control people's reactions in the chatter forum.
>>NEVER
>>
>>I see that people (me included) are tired of this discussion.
>>And I ensure you that Naomi knows the reasons why some people twitted her.
>>
>>If she doesn't know exactly, she has just to think a little.
>>And sometimes there is nothing you can do about this.
>>You simply can't oblige someone to hear you.
>>
>>The best medicine is to let the time pass.
>>Time will help to fix things.
>
>All true, to some extend. Still it's a pity that nobody took time to give an analytical/rational response. The filter system is far from perfect and can easily be improved. The positive result of an improved filter system would be a community with far less flame wars than we're now seeing here.

Peter,

I guess I missed your thread discussing how to easily improve he twit filter on UT.
Can you point me to it, or start one so it can be discussed?