>>>>Her current reaction (I'm refering now to this thread's main message) cannot (should not) be regarded as whining. It's a proposal for a better filter system. It's actually quite analytic, and reactions should have been analytic too.
>>>
>>>You can't control people's reactions in the chatter forum.
>>>NEVER
>>>
>>>I see that people (me included) are tired of this discussion.
>>>And I ensure you that Naomi knows the reasons why some people twitted her.
>>>
>>>If she doesn't know exactly, she has just to think a little.
>>>And sometimes there is nothing you can do about this.
>>>You simply can't oblige someone to hear you.
>>>
>>>The best medicine is to let the time pass.
>>>Time will help to fix things.
>>
>>All true, to some extend. Still it's a pity that nobody took time to give an analytical/rational response. The filter system is far from perfect and can easily be improved. The positive result of an improved filter system would be a community with far less flame wars than we're now seeing here.
>
>Peter,
>
>I guess I missed your thread discussing how to easily improve he twit filter on UT.
>Can you point me to it, or start one so it can be discussed?
Naomi tried to start one: This one. See what happened with it.
Do you really, honestly ask me to start one??? I don't believe you. It would merely be the next episode of this soap.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
