>>Cesar, this reaction to Naomi is nonsense. Her reaction was directed to me and she's essentially pleaing me to stop, rather than to 'bring all this shit' even more. Also she's not crying at all.
>
>Peter,
>
>Someone along the way said yoou were living a Monty Python skit. I must agree.

Then you must be living in it too. What's the role you chose?

>She was pleading for you to stop?... Plese show me the words in her message that say that. There were no such words. In fact her statement was hardly sensible... see her words about 'sympathy'.

Yes, she was pleading me in her way to stop. Funny thing here is that I, not a native speaker, read English better than you, a native speaker, do.

>And you say she's not crying at all. Maybe you should read the first messge of this thread.

Maybe YOU should read her first message. Where is she crying there?????

>Surey EVEN YOU can see that the overwhelming majority have no sympathy for Naomi's desire to be loved by everyone. Only someone like Naomi could turn such great sympathy into even greater distaste in the space of a few short months.

The overwhelming majority here is only reading this thread to some extend and shaking the head. I'm sure some of them think of me as naive at best and wonder how long I will continue to endure all those attacks here.

It is forbidden on this forum to use pejorative words and to be insulting. But it can be concluded that some here have succeeded to be insulting without being detected as such. Every time people here write to me to grow up, to stop whining, they are insulting me. Sure I might decide to stop reacting to those insults, but for the time being I won't. Instead I'll defend my full right to give my opinion. If you all don't like that, ask Michel to BAN me, or add me to all your TWIT filters.

No need to advice me to add you all to my own twit filter or to complain at the UT office for being insulted. That's not my style.