Versions des environnements
Network:
Windows 2003 Server
>>Good: you have the idea, but you did not try it yourself, you did not find any appropriate example either. So, what is the point of talking about it, what is the point of saying that something is not appropriate in the code that I posted? I do not think it is the way the discussion should continue.
>
>Hi Yuri,
>
>I am not sure why you're always twisting what I am saying. I said, that we can implement binding to Windows Events instead of using a timer. The code sample is in the Solutions New in VFP9\Binding to Windows Message events. Yes, I didn't try it myself, but I was thinking about it and wanted to suggest an alternative which to me seems to be better resource wise.
>
>I don't have VFP at the computers I'm writting messages, so I can dig some code from various places, but I thought the idea is transparent enough.
>
>I am not saying that the current implementation is bad, but I believe it could be improved with this idea.
>
>BTW, where did I say the highlighted phrase? I think this is your interpretation, which is incorrect.
Probably you do not understand that your messages always look this way if you do not support your opinion with the code example. Try your idea first, then bring here the code example, and with explanation what is better, and why. This is the productive way to talk. Otherwise it is waste of time, nothing else.
I think we exchange opinions. Let us close this chapter and go to work.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement