I am starting to suspect some people missed Michel's very clear statement over the weekend. Can someone with UT search capability find it and post a link? TIA.

>I actually saw a couple today when I was searching for the thread you pointed to. I can't locate them right now, but I will when I return tonight :o)
>
>I agree with your first comment. Whatever the reason he was banned, something would have to change for Michel to decide to bring him back. Either he would have to commit to changing his behavior or Michel would have to decide on a limit to the length of a ban allowing for a trial period after that banned term was reached. If the behavior persisted again, then ban again. I'm all for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th chances.
>
>To be honest, I think it is a business decision of Michel's (mostly) and those who oppose him coming back have a stronger voice with Michel than those who support it.
>
>
>>Tracy, assuming that we're sticking with the topic of the thread ;-) it's important to figure out what went wrong last time and what might convince Michel that things are different. If it was everybody else's fault, then there is no hope.
>>
>>For the rest: are you able to provide threads from 2004 that show focus on technical concerns followed by swarmings by VFP'ers?