>>There is one drawback to the Twit filter. If someone who is on my list responds to one of my posts, then I never see it (right, that's the point). But, often then I think others will not respond as they believe it has already been answered. What about keeping the person who is Twitted from being able to respond directly to you? Just a thought...
>
>Hmm, that's actually a form of censorship. Consider:
>
>1. I twit you
>2. I create a message that says "Jay Johengen is a dew fuss"
>
>If your request is implemented, you would be unable to respond directly to my post.

If I've Twitted you, I probably have no interest in responding to that. I've come across a couple of those when looking through a thread. Not a big deal to me.

>You could start another thread with a message calling me an ice hole, but since I've twitted you, I wouldn't see it. So, there would be these unrelated threads with the antagonists unable to address each other.

Again, not a problem, for me anyway.

>Another side effect is that anyone you twit would find out that you've twitted them. Some might not care about that but some people might prefer to keep their twit list private.

Yeah, that's a good point. I don't care about it, but others probably would.