Hi Michel,
it will not change inside or outside code block. The problem is, that I can not mention a html tag. I can once, using &_g_t_;, but if I update or reply, it will tranform into its respective sign and will be lost. For example a <BlaBal > will be shown correctly in the orignal mail, but will be lost in replys or updates. After a simple Preview / Update it will be transformed an no more invisible.
Look in the line below and see whats happen.
<blu >
The one you see is generated with &_g_t_;, and this is not a tag. But this will be lost after a reply. And this is not what I would expect. It should keep the &_g_t_;, but should display the sign.
For the code thing. I agree that tags within the pre block should not be do any html action. But they should remain as entered.
Agnes
>>
>>#IF .F.
>>I've noticed that if I put a &_g_t_; and edit the message afterwards (Update / reply) the &_g_t_; turns to > (as this one).
>>This will not be shown later on. (Thats why I wrote this as a comment)
>>#endif
>>='>'
>>
>
>Inside code, no tag should be put in there. This will be converted automatically.
Words are given to man to enable him to conceal his true feelings.
Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord
Weeks of programming can save you hours of planning.
OffThere is no place like [::1]