OK. You're right:

John, when the news of Naomi and Andy and Marcia became public, you (and I, and others) certainly let out a large supply of public sarcasm about what happened.

However, when we have another situation of a "behind the back informant", you seem far less interested in holding the "anonymous e-mailer" accountable.

Could it be that you were only ever interested in public criticism to begin with because you had some disagreements with Marcia....and that you might feel a bit of sympathy for someone who felt "provoked" by Woody's initial post?