>Just wanted to nofity that Kevin has been banned from the UT.
>
>I'm not going to take any sides in this matter, but to me it was a bit unexpected since Kevin and I got into really technical arguments without bitching eachother. That initself was a real accomplishment.
>
>I avoided Kevins other threads, so I don't know what the reasoning is for banning him and I really do not want to make any speculations as of why he was been banned.
>
>I'm considering continue the dicussions with kevin on another platform (maybe his blogg). Just to let you know.
I think he was joking here (Message #
1300352), but maybe Kevin wasn't in the eyes of the 'administration'.
What strikes me is that there's no public statement of the administration. Confidentiality is a positive thing, sure, but so is an honest and open statement. And it must be possible to write such a statement without disclosing really confidential facts.
Oh, by the way, this will be my only message in this thread. I will not further participate in this 'debate', although it is kind of special. But I want the people to know what I think of it. See my topmost remark in the signature and (re)read Message #
1299161 for a broader explanation.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
