Peter, For the first time, I have to agree with you.
If our moderator had been more present, and at least a warning message was sent in those problematic threads, I think that this problem would have certainly been avoided.

Michel posted a general "warning", but I suspect that some people did not understand what exacltly was included in the warning... Too bad... for all of us.

Kevin Goff will be indeed a big loss for UT.




>>Just wanted to nofity that Kevin has been banned from the UT.
>>
>>I'm not going to take any sides in this matter, but to me it was a bit unexpected since Kevin and I got into really technical arguments without bitching eachother. That initself was a real accomplishment.
>>
>>I avoided Kevins other threads, so I don't know what the reasoning is for banning him and I really do not want to make any speculations as of why he was been banned.
>>
>>I'm considering continue the dicussions with kevin on another platform (maybe his blogg). Just to let you know.
>
>I think he was joking here (Message #1300352), but maybe Kevin wasn't in the eyes of the 'administration'.
>
>What strikes me is that there's no public statement of the administration. Confidentiality is a positive thing, sure, but so is an honest and open statement. And it must be possible to write such a statement without disclosing really confidential facts.
>
>Oh, by the way, this will be my only message in this thread. I will not further participate in this 'debate', although it is kind of special. But I want the people to know what I think of it. See my topmost remark in the signature and (re)read Message #1299161 for a broader explanation.