>>You are correct, I have no evidence that Kevin allowed anyone to use his UT account. My only evidence is that it takes a lot more than being irritating to get banned from UT as far as I know. I apoligize for expressing my guess "out loud".
>
>But that is not evidence either. It is still only speculation since Michel never posts why someone was banned and the rest of us can only guess the reason. Michel's statement that it has to be something serious to warrant banning could mean any number of things or nothing at all.
>
>Really, I'm sure everyone is guessing and no one knows (except Michel). The problem with speculating on very serious reasons is that when it comes from an MVP, the public tends to think there is substance behind the 'guess' and information not available to the public which gives the 'guess' more weight and hence the guess is more damaging.

Then let us also turn this topic around and tell everyone that are making claims like "This banning is unjustified!" and "I see nothing wrong that Kevin has done in the recent past that would warrant a ban". These are also speculations, as you point out we do not know what motivated Michel to ban Kevin.