>>>>>>>>I am drawing a line in the sand for freedom. This travesty will not stand.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Which travesty? Whose "freedom"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think you know exactly what I'm talking about.
>>>>>
>>>>>I initially guessed the banning of KevinG, but I didn't see any connection to "freedom" so I discounted that and asked.
>>>>
>>>>I can neither confirm nor deny that.
>>>
>>>I think we should take this matter under consideration. A committee, maybe. Or possibly a white paper?
>>
>>
>>It is strange that after 10 years of UT, it is still the best discussion board software. Period.
>>
>>Nothing lets you read your replies the way the UT does.
>>
>>And that seems to be one of the most basic functions I can imagine wanting in a discussion board.
>>
>>The idea of creating a new utchatter domain, and seeing how fast we can grow it is fascinating.
>>
>>
>>I'm with Michel on this one.
>>
>>We should close down the UT chatter forums.
>>
>>Start a new domain.
>>
>>Have Michel donate the software.
>>
>>And start sending out invites.
>
>
>Thank you for your endorsement of a new chatter forum ;-(
>
>http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/shared-blogs/ajc/luckovich/entries/2008/03/06/oops_1.html



Think about it. We could start inviting people that have nothing to do with VFP or computer programming.

My intuition is that the UT is unique enough, and of a high enough quality to get some attention.

Michel might even be a multi-millionaire by the end of the week.

I'll have to look at the advertising rates.

I'd be interested in advertising there.