>>>>>>>>>I am drawing a line in the sand for freedom. This travesty will not stand.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Which travesty? Whose "freedom"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I think you know exactly what I'm talking about.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I initially guessed the banning of KevinG, but I didn't see any connection to "freedom" so I discounted that and asked.
>>>>>
>>>>>I can neither confirm nor deny that.
>>>>
>>>>I think we should take this matter under consideration. A committee, maybe. Or possibly a white paper?
>>>
>>>
>>>It is strange that after 10 years of UT, it is still the best discussion board software. Period.
>>>
>>>Nothing lets you read your replies the way the UT does.
>>>
>>>And that seems to be one of the most basic functions I can imagine wanting in a discussion board.
>>>
>>>The idea of creating a new utchatter domain, and seeing how fast we can grow it is fascinating.
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm with Michel on this one.
>>>
>>>We should close down the UT chatter forums.
>>>
>>>Start a new domain.
>>>
>>>Have Michel donate the software.
>>>
>>>And start sending out invites.
>>
>>
>>Thank you for your endorsement of a new chatter forum ;-(
>>
>>http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/shared-blogs/ajc/luckovich/entries/2008/03/06/oops_1.html
>
>
>
>Think about it. We could start inviting people that have nothing to do with VFP or computer programming.
>
>My intuition is that the UT is unique enough, and of a high enough quality to get some attention.
>
>Michel might even be a multi-millionaire by the end of the week.
>
>I'll have to look at the advertising rates.
>
>I'd be interested in advertising there.


*tap* *tap*


Anyone listening?

We should do this immediately.