>>>>>>>>>>>I am drawing a line in the sand for freedom. This travesty will not stand.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Which travesty? Whose "freedom"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I think you know exactly what I'm talking about.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I initially guessed the banning of KevinG, but I didn't see any connection to "freedom" so I discounted that and asked.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I can neither confirm nor deny that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think we should take this matter under consideration. A committee, maybe. Or possibly a white paper?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>It is strange that after 10 years of UT, it is still the best discussion board software. Period.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nothing lets you read your replies the way the UT does.
>>>>>
>>>>>And that seems to be one of the most basic functions I can imagine wanting in a discussion board.
>>>>>
>>>>>The idea of creating a new utchatter domain, and seeing how fast we can grow it is fascinating.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm with Michel on this one.
>>>>>
>>>>>We should close down the UT chatter forums.
>>>>>
>>>>>Start a new domain.
>>>>>
>>>>>Have Michel donate the software.
>>>>>
>>>>>And start sending out invites.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thank you for your endorsement of a new chatter forum ;-(
>>>>
>>>>http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/shared-blogs/ajc/luckovich/entries/2008/03/06/oops_1.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Think about it. We could start inviting people that have nothing to do with VFP or computer programming.
>>>
>>>My intuition is that the UT is unique enough, and of a high enough quality to get some attention.
>>>
>>>Michel might even be a multi-millionaire by the end of the week.
>>>
>>>I'll have to look at the advertising rates.
>>>
>>>I'd be interested in advertising there.
>>
>>
>>*tap* *tap*
>>
>>
>>Anyone listening?
>>
>>We should do this immediately.
>
>No-one's stopping you. Let us know when it's up and running!

My friend the rabbi tells me "Every Jew needs two synagogues: the one he attends and the one he 'wouldn't be caught dead in' " <bg>