>>>>>>>>>>I am drawing a line in the sand for freedom. This travesty will not stand.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Which travesty? Whose "freedom"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I think you know exactly what I'm talking about.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I initially guessed the banning of KevinG, but I didn't see any connection to "freedom" so I discounted that and asked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I can neither confirm nor deny that.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think we should take this matter under consideration. A committee, maybe. Or possibly a white paper?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It is strange that after 10 years of UT, it is still the best discussion board software. Period.
>>>>
>>>>Nothing lets you read your replies the way the UT does.
>>>>
>>>>And that seems to be one of the most basic functions I can imagine wanting in a discussion board.
>>>>
>>>>The idea of creating a new utchatter domain, and seeing how fast we can grow it is fascinating.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I'm with Michel on this one.
>>>>
>>>>We should close down the UT chatter forums.
>>>>
>>>>Start a new domain.
>>>>
>>>>Have Michel donate the software.
>>>>
>>>>And start sending out invites.
>>>
>>>
>>>Thank you for your endorsement of a new chatter forum ;-(
>>>
>>>http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/shared-blogs/ajc/luckovich/entries/2008/03/06/oops_1.html
>>
>>
>>
>>Think about it. We could start inviting people that have nothing to do with VFP or computer programming.
>>
>>My intuition is that the UT is unique enough, and of a high enough quality to get some attention.
>>
>>Michel might even be a multi-millionaire by the end of the week.
>>
>>I'll have to look at the advertising rates.
>>
>>I'd be interested in advertising there.
>
>
>*tap* *tap*
>
>
>Anyone listening?
>
>We should do this immediately.

No-one's stopping you. Let us know when it's up and running!