>On a more serious note, I think Michel is flat out wrong for not disclosing this information.
>
>First let me say that I also don't agree with Kevin's banishment.
>
>Now consider this. If you were a regular at a restaurant for many rears, and one day they said, "We don't want
>you in here ever again!", you would absolutly no options whatsoever. It's a private business and the owner can
>decide who he/she wants in there. Period.
>
>How is this different that then Kevin's access to the UT?

I don't know about USA, but in Norway all restaurants must have a licence, and one of the criteria to get this licence is that they must allow everybody in. They can have restrictions, like age restrictions or a dress code, but otherwise they must let everyone in as long as they have available seats. The only other reason they can have to not let anyone in, is that the person in question must have made trouble at this place earlier, or the person must have some criminal record.