Charles, I don't want to make this any more of a UT issue than it is (which is not at all!) so after due consideration, here's my last word on the topic:

If I were involved in FoxRockx and received such an approach, I'd create a FoxRockx policy: archived articles can be eradicated at their author's request for whatever reason (e.g. because later versions of Fox made the content incorrect or misleading.) Eradication consists of a grey box overlaid on the article with a footnote pointing to the FoxRockx policy. I'd create an entry form requiring identification of the author/s and the article they want removed- what volume/edition etc. Then I'd advise this author of the policy and furnish an entry form for his use.

Then I'd get on with creating my exciting magazine, confident that the complainant has an adequate remedy should he choose to make use of it.