>
>I realized that you might not see this when I Updated my response, so here it is again:
>
>Ah, so all the issues are just from me? Interesting. But I'm invited, so I don't have to accept. Though, anything I say is subject to immediate "administrative procedures." That's pretty airtight. So, if I mention Kevin again, I'm out? If I question anything you do, I'm out? If I say anything that you feel is trolling/polluting, I'm out? That is an interesting proposal. And you put it out there publicly. You've never done that before. Something just doesn't seem quite right here, but I can't put my finger on it. I'll get back to you.
>
>UPDATE: Ok, I've thought about it and I don't accept your invitation. Do what you want. If you feel you have enough to ban me and you think that is the right thing to do, then do it. If you want to wait until I say something you don't like, then do it then. I will say this, if you do ban me, at least have the guts to tell everyone here what it's for. I not only give you permission and forfeit any legal path - like I would bother with something so trivial - but encourage you to tell all. The part that's going to be interesting is that there is nothing you can share that everyone here hasn't already read. No secret logins, no midnight hacking, no illusions of JVP around every corner. Nope. Just stuff you don't like to hear. Just make sure you let everyone know why you ban me when you decide to do it. Trust me, they will really want to know. Especially after the whole Kevin fiasco.

I hate to say this, but I must confess that I also find your posts in these threads extremely boring and negative. To quote Socrates "If you have nothing good to say, don't say it".