Most of what you write is so twisted in its logic it amazes me Walter. Really, I sometimes wonder.
The below is so utterly ridiculous though that it deserves a comment.
>What would we have thought right now, if hitler succeeded in killing every jew and created a new world order with a 'volkswagen' and a job for each and every citizen in its empire? We'd probably would not have defined him as evil, but as a hero that succeeded in overcomming the depression of the 30's of the previous century.
The idea that if Hitler had accomplished what you wrote that the world would consider him a hero is terrifying. That you could consider it amazes me.
"If your opponent has a conscience, then follow Gandhi. But if your enemy has no
conscience, like Hitler, then follow Bonhoeffer." - Martin Luther King, Jr., speaking
about Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the martyred World War II pastorArguendo, Argumentum ad hominem, and Argumentum ad ignorantiam do not a good argument make.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"