>Re-writing history now Walter? Your statement is not accurate.
>
>Iraq has not supplied all the information sought by inspectors about when and how it destroyed previous stocks of chemical and biological weapons, built up during the 1980s with assistance from the United States and European countries, Blix said. It was impossible as yet to prove conclusively that all these weapons had been destroyed.
>
>“One must not jump to the conclusion that they exist,” Blix said. “However, that possibility is also not excluded.”
>
>Blix, 15 February 2003

So..... ?? Isn't that exactly what I meant here? The conclusion was that there is no evidence that they existed. Please don't bend the argument.

It does not really matter. To me, the US was determined to invade iraq irregardless the evidence. And that was because there was a more compelling (but harder to sell) argument to start the war. Now before you start acusing me again from anti-americanism... This stance is supported my the majority of americans as well.