"When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean, nothing more and nothing less."

-- Humpty Dumpty to Alice

>It doesn't specify 'accept design changes or feature requests.' It implies they will be done by MSFT. Of course they will always be submitted and accepted. No company will ever do all requests, but it is implied that some will be done. With no developers assigned at MSFT on VFP, it is obvious that NONE will be done. Your interpretation is ridiculous but probably accurate. It is time for MSFT to get sued over the wording so they have to clarify if that is their intent - then it pertains to all products. One day they will in fact pay the price for their own policy/language. No surprise there.
>
>
>>They'll always accept them, but no product will implement all of them. So, still don't see any contridictions.
>>
>>>Not even:
>>>
>>>Design changes and feature requests?
>>>
>>>
>>>>I don't see anything that contradicts what Microsoft is doing with their current VFP support policy.
>>>>
>>>>>Not according to the chart (see my response to Sergey)...