General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
As I said, you're spot on!
This is why we look at things like the VFP .Net compiler project as a possible bridge between VFP and a .Net re-write, but not as a viable development path moving forward. It's why we convert forms and reports, but not code. It's why we advocate re-architecture in most cases (yes, we have come across 1, count em' 1 VFP app that was well architected into tiers). In real life, we throw away about 75% of what was coded in VFP. Very little of the .Net code looks anything like the original VFP code. The things that come across best are SQL statements which usually require a little tweaking, but get you 90% of the way there.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only