>Cetin,
>
>Thanks for your input but I know for sure it is a corruption problem.
>
>This is not a new application and the processing has been working fine for
>years now.
>
>Maybe I sould have given you example of data:
>
> seek '990037-606' was successful as per the found() function,
>
> but the record pointer was positionned on project 992033-FTR after
> the seek.
>
>I evidently tested that in command mode to make sure I was not going crazy :)
>
>I guess the only solution is to add a reindex of all files before the month-end processing (which will add about 20-30 mins) or to figure out what is causing these corruptions.
>
>Thanks
>
>Pascal
Pascal what I was trying to say was "found() returning .t. only points that there was a match. It doesn't guarantee rec pointer is on correct record if you have a relation". OK it's a corruption. As Ed pointed out check for network first.
Cetin