>>Like Mike, I haven't read the article, only heard/saw a couple of summaries. But if the administration is doing things that are meant to lead to war in Iran, I want to know, I want Congress to know, I want the world to know.
>>
>>I'll look for the article this evening.
>>
>>Tamar
>
>That's all well in and good if you're talking about a proposed arms deal with Saudi Arabia. But certain kinds of activity being exposed in this fashion mean good people being put at great risk. It is not the way to oppose a policy with which you disagree. Phillip Agee was convinced he was on the side of the angels when he got some very good people killed. It is really irresponsible and reflects a political mindset that really doesn't see the consequences but is primarily concerned with scoring political points.
Here is a link to the article.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/07/07/080707fa_fact_hersh/?currentPage=1I sure don't see anything that would put anyone at risk.
