>Hi Russell.
>
>>Thanks for the link. Cool stuff. I wonder about these interfaces, however. They are great in the right situation, but with lots of data I imagine they will be slow and I also wonder about searching. I think they can be quite good for smaller datasets.
>
>The TreeView is quite slow to load, but the classes I showed use delayed loading: the child nodes of a parent are only loaded when you expand the parent the first time. As a result, the TreeView doesn't waste time loading nodes the user may not see. I use something like this for the Stonefield Query Configuration Utility and it loads a 40,000 record tree in just a few seconds because it only loads the top-level nodes.
>
>But you're right -- this interface isn't for every kind of application. It's specific for when you want an Explorer-style UI.
>
>Doug

Yep - it all depends on the situation. I like what you've done. I've been using this type of interface at times, but for small datasets. And some of it is based on your treeview article from FoxTalk (I think it was FT). Will these classes be available to people not attending SW Fox?