>I don't pretend to understand the complexities of the Balkans in the 90's. But you're right - Serbia was the "bad guy". The root problem, IMHO, was that Yugoslavia was always an artificial country and when it began to fall apart it did not do so peacefully.

Or perceived/coined as bad guy, where it was more like tripartite 'axis of evil' (Milosevic/Tudjman/Izetbegovic leaderships)
However perception in this case amounted to conviction of mostly one side. This is exacty what I have problem with.
Other then that, I admit that there is price to pay for people folowing bad leadership.