Oh, well of course. But if it doesn't, I'm sure he is still to blame. He must be all seeing, all knowing, and all powerfull :o)


>You'll see. The day after he returns to the U.S. All this will simply stop. ;)
>
>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7609487.stm
>>>
>>>Mr Morales [the president] accused Philip Goldberg of "conspiring against democracy" and encouraging the country's break-up.
>>>
>>>Well, there has been lots of turbulence recently - so it now seems that the U.S. ambassador is at fault? At least, that's what Mr. Morales seems to claim.
>>
>>Well, this is somewhat confusing. I'm not clear on the part in the below that the U.S. ambassador is responsible for?
>>
>>Opposition groups want a greater autonomy as well as more control over revenues of natural gas in their areas.
>>
>>They object to Mr Morales' plans to give more power to the country's indigenous and poor communities, by carrying out land reform and redistributing gas revenues.
>>
>>Earlier this week, the government announced it was sending the military to protect gas fields and infrastructure from demonstrators and guarantee exports to neighbouring countries.
>>
>>On Wednesday, officials said saboteurs had caused a blast on a pipeline, forcing them to cut natural gas exports to neighbouring Brazil by 10%.
>>