>Oh, well of course. But if it doesn't, I'm sure he is still to blame. He must be all seeing, all knowing, and all powerfull :o)

Oh, no! I'm certain that if it doesn't stop, Morales will see the error in his assumptions and invite Goldberg back again. ;)

>
>
>>You'll see. The day after he returns to the U.S. All this will simply stop. ;)
>>
>>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7609487.stm
>>>>
>>>>Mr Morales [the president] accused Philip Goldberg of "conspiring against democracy" and encouraging the country's break-up.
>>>>
>>>>Well, there has been lots of turbulence recently - so it now seems that the U.S. ambassador is at fault? At least, that's what Mr. Morales seems to claim.
>>>
>>>Well, this is somewhat confusing. I'm not clear on the part in the below that the U.S. ambassador is responsible for?
>>>
>>>Opposition groups want a greater autonomy as well as more control over revenues of natural gas in their areas.
>>>
>>>They object to Mr Morales' plans to give more power to the country's indigenous and poor communities, by carrying out land reform and redistributing gas revenues.
>>>
>>>Earlier this week, the government announced it was sending the military to protect gas fields and infrastructure from demonstrators and guarantee exports to neighbouring countries.
>>>
>>>On Wednesday, officials said saboteurs had caused a blast on a pipeline, forcing them to cut natural gas exports to neighbouring Brazil by 10%.
>>>