>>>>>Some will reflexively say this is just a partisan post. But I don't see how anyone can read this article with any degree of open mindedness and not be troubled about the prospect of this person becoming President of the U.S.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/14palin.html?scp=13&sq=sarah%20palin&st=cse
>>>>
>>>>Read your post again Mike. It's like the women who says 'Some of you will just disregard my statements because I am a woman.' You already put the premise out there that anyone who would want to discuss it is either partisan or is not open minded. It's a typical democratic ploy and I'm dissappointed in you. You're starting to copy the pundits...
>>>
>>>It's not a democratic ploy, it's a political ploy. Wasn't it Dubya who said a couple of years back, "You're either for us or against us."? Was he a democrat at that moment?
>>
>>I was referring specifically to the democratic pundits during Obama's campaign (before Hillary was out of the game)...
>
>Hmmm.... "It's a typical democratic ploy." Well, ok.

Oh I see now. Yes, that was a poor choice of words...