>>>>>>Some will reflexively say this is just a partisan post. But I don't see how anyone can read this article with any degree of open mindedness and not be troubled about the prospect of this person becoming President of the U.S.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/14palin.html?scp=13&sq=sarah%20palin&st=cse
>>>>>
>>>>>Read your post again Mike. It's like the women who says 'Some of you will just disregard my statements because I am a woman.' You already put the premise out there that anyone who would want to discuss it is either partisan or is not open minded. It's a typical democratic ploy and I'm dissappointed in you. You're starting to copy the pundits...
>>>>
>>>>It's not a democratic ploy, it's a political ploy. Wasn't it Dubya who said a couple of years back, "You're either for us or against us."? Was he a democrat at that moment?
>>>
>>>I was referring specifically to the democratic pundits during Obama's campaign (before Hillary was out of the game)...
>>
>>Hmmm.... "It's a typical democratic ploy." Well, ok.
>
>Oh I see now. Yes, that was a poor choice of words...

Good thing I'm here to point this stuff out, eh? Like my friend Joe says to me from time to time, "Hmm... maybe you're not completely useless after all." ;)