Hi Michelle,

Yea,I guess one could.

But I would call that a 'workaround' and I would bet that. sooner or later, it would come back to haunt.

Cheers,

Jim N

>>*IF* you do this in any method, then the parent method will *NOT* (repeat: not) run. I find this to be a particularly nasty "feature" of VFP. I would have thought that it could have been written to confirm that there is some *ACTUAL EXECUTABLE CODE* present before making such a MAJOR assumption! But that ain't the way it is.
>
>Can't you just put "DODEFAULT()" after the comment?
>
>-Michelle