What would be nice is if when you have a subclass, the code from the parent shows up there. It would be read only, of course, but at least you could see if there's code in there.

-Michelle


>Hi Michelle,
>
>Yea,I guess one could.
>
>But I would call that a 'workaround' and I would bet that. sooner or later, it would come back to haunt.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Jim N
>
>>>*IF* you do this in any method, then the parent method will *NOT* (repeat: not) run. I find this to be a particularly nasty "feature" of VFP. I would have thought that it could have been written to confirm that there is some *ACTUAL EXECUTABLE CODE* present before making such a MAJOR assumption! But that ain't the way it is.
>>
>>Can't you just put "DODEFAULT()" after the comment?
>>
>>-Michelle