What would be nice is if when you have a subclass, the code from the parent shows up there. It would be read only, of course, but at least you could see if there's code in there.
-Michelle
>Hi Michelle,
>
>Yea,I guess one could.
>
>But I would call that a 'workaround' and I would bet that. sooner or later, it would come back to haunt.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Jim N
>
>>>*IF* you do this in any method, then the parent method will *NOT* (repeat: not) run. I find this to be a particularly nasty "feature" of VFP. I would have thought that it could have been written to confirm that there is some *ACTUAL EXECUTABLE CODE* present before making such a MAJOR assumption! But that ain't the way it is.
>>
>>Can't you just put "DODEFAULT()" after the comment?
>>
>>-Michelle
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only