>>References to polling result appear to cut two ways: 1) supporting your position when your candidate is ahead 2) totally meaningless and fraught with big margins of error and bias when your candidate is behind. Maybe we should do polling about polling to resolve this?
>
>The current polls seem extremely wise and accurate ;-)
And you can take that to the bank. Oops, I confusing issues... haha
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only