>Hi,
>
>>Are you looking for new ?
>
>Yes! I forgotten about that usage but as soon as I saw the line above I knew what you were suggesting!
>
>Should work fine. Thanks,
>Viv


Viv,

Hear my confession. I had not forgotten about that usage - I simply didn't know about it.

I tried without the new (and the stuff in the main) and whilst debugging OrderB I saw that it still had the 'old' (base) List and that the old List was hidden.

In all honesty - it was the compiler that suggested the new keyword