>>>>>>I think the twit filter should hide every message where the twitted person is involved, either as orginal poster or recipient of another post.
>>>>>
>>>>>I disagree. I think it should hide every message originating from the filtered person only. If the person filtered is a recipient of another message, and the sender is not in the twit filter, it should be visible. Let's say I twitted Jay and you sent a message to Jay in response to his message. I don't see Jay's original message, but I do see yours because you are not in my twit filter. I think that is as it should be. I only see Jay's message if you include his message in your response.
>>>>
>>>>I think that all messages should be hidden that contain the word, or partial word 'twit'.
>>>
>>>HEAR - freakin' - HEAR!
>>>
>>>very similar to what I just posted. Irony is we have to keep this thread alive with more posts in order to demand its demise.
>>
>>"Hear, Hear" wouldn't be a cliché, would it? ;)
>
>No, but "I hear what you're saying", "I'll take that on board", et al are.
>
>E voila, the pointless twit filter thread is continued with off-topic trivia

What other use is there for a pointless twit filter thread?