>>>>>>>I think the twit filter should hide every message where the twitted person is involved, either as orginal poster or recipient of another post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I disagree. I think it should hide every message originating from the filtered person only. If the person filtered is a recipient of another message, and the sender is not in the twit filter, it should be visible. Let's say I twitted Jay and you sent a message to Jay in response to his message. I don't see Jay's original message, but I do see yours because you are not in my twit filter. I think that is as it should be. I only see Jay's message if you include his message in your response.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think that all messages should be hidden that contain the word, or partial word 'twit'.
>>>>
>>>>HEAR - freakin' - HEAR!
>>>>
>>>>very similar to what I just posted. Irony is we have to keep this thread alive with more posts in order to demand its demise.
>>>
>>>"Hear, Hear" wouldn't be a cliché, would it? ;)
>>
>>No, but "I hear what you're saying", "I'll take that on board", et al are.
>>
>>E voila, the pointless twit filter thread is continued with off-topic trivia
>
>What other use is there for a pointless twit filter thread?

Just run the twit up the flag pole and see who salutes it.