>>>>>>>>>>I think the twit filter should hide every message where the twitted person is involved, either as orginal poster or recipient of another post.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I think that there should not be a twit filter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>How much did Naomi pay you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There should be a twat filter for those who write about the twit filter!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, let's hold hands and sing together ...
>>>>>
>>>>>You do realise that "twat" wasn't a typo, and has maybe a different meaning in Brit-Eng?
>>>>
>>>>Didn't think it was a typo.
>>>>
>>>>If it means the same thing on your side of the pond that it does on my side...........my personal opinion is that it is (ummmmm) inappropriate.
>>>
>>>Aside what i think the common meaning is, over here it also means like a "super twit", an @asshole, jerk, etc.
>>
>>Disregard my post just now on this topic. I see it has already been, uh, covered.
>
>Seems a twat filter wouldn't exactly prohibit interaction but might mean you'd strain something in attempting social intercourse.
You're on your own here, buddy ;-)
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only