Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
What kind of president will Obama be?
Message
From
21/01/2009 15:13:07
 
 
To
21/01/2009 13:47:37
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01374786
Message ID:
01376022
Views:
29
>>>>>What I'm asking you and others for is some real evidence, not anecdotes, that the number of people who are abusing the welfare system is a significant percentage of the number of people receiving assistance. Of course, there are some cheats (as there are in pretty much any system), but the question is whether they are a large enough subset as to render the whole program invalid.
>>>>>
>>>>>Tamar
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>http://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/fraud/PG270.htm
>>>>
>>>>Just in California for 2007-2008.
>>>
>>>Still anecdotes. How about offering numbers? percentages?
>>>
>>>Frankly, if that's all California has for 2007-08, even if we acknowledge that it's only the ones they caught, it's a pretty small set. How many people live in California? How many receive welfare?
>>>
>>>Tamar
>>
>>Are you well?
>>Did you even read the article?
>
>What article? The link you posted is titled "Welfare Fraud Stories" and documents about a dozen specific episodes. Maybe that wasn't the link you meant to post?
>
>>California has big financial probelms and that all you can say? You think these are small numbers?
>>
>>"While exact figures are difficult to tally, experts estimate as much as $300 billion a year is lost to health care fraud in the United States "
>>
>>"$34 billion annually to provide care for about 7 million indigent Californians - with about $3 billion of that lost to fraud, experts say.."
>
>Okay, now I see this there. Since the page appeared to be just anecdotes, I skimmed it originally. Of course, even this item just quotes unnamed "experts." It'd be nice to know who they are and where they came up with that number.
>
>Yeah, 10% of expenditure in fraud is on the high side. It still doesn't answer the question as to what percent of _recipients_ are cheating, which was the question I asked.
>
>It also says most of the fraud is organized crime, not the so-called "no-hopers" we've been talking about in this thread. I'm in favor of going after organized crime aggressively.
>
>Tamar

Michigan is pursuing justice. It's not just the recipients who commit welfare fraud, but businesses too (see video on this page for tv media report):

http://www.wxyz.com/news/local/story/Food-Stamp-Fraud-Crackdown/1EWsT1ypGU6rnXPxDxzVCg.cspx

and the results from the State Attorney General:

More than a Half Million Dollars of Fraud Alleged
More than $100,000 Recovered in Raid


http://www.michigan.gov/documents/dhs/DHS-AG-FAPFraud-NewsRelease-091908_250758_7.pdf

In general, fraud is alleged since there is seldom proof:

Each year more than $54 million worth of fraud is alleged in connection to food stamp
trafficking in the State of Michigan
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform