>>>>I believe, IIRC, that your initial version showed who viewed the message. And I remember that some expressed concern about privacy issue; which makes sense. I think what Matt is saying is to show how many times a message has been viewed without showing the names or IDs. This would not invade any body's privacy.
>>>
>>>I would have to add this one into the next survey. lol
>>
>>You know, you make a good point about making sure not to upset some people. I can even see now (without naming names *g*) that some will raise issue that their messages are not viewed as often as some others.
>
>I wonder if anyone has any idea what the point of this is. I wondered what people would use this information for in a previous post, but I never got an answer from anyone - not even Matt who suggested it in the first place.
>
>If there's no advertising revenue, then who cares.

My guess is the point is narcissism.