>>>Since when is NET 'proven' technology ?!? Are you talking about NET 1.1 , or latest 3.5 which is... how old ?
>>
>>Are you kidding? .NET is clearly proven technology - it's been around since circa 2000 and used all around the world in a vast number of situations. That is, unless you are looking through VFP tinted glasses.
>>
>>It's totally laughable that you can even utter such nonsense.
>
>Yes, I was mostly kidding. Now, can you spare me of that kind of attitute and explain what is so 'proven' in technology that changes
>it's guts every few years apparently to the tune of solutions needing serious rewrites. Are new versions of NET framework backward compatible ? Yes , no, partialy , fully ?
>
>I don't do NET yet, but that is what I read. So enlighten me. Do you have all your 1.1 apps upgraded to 3.5 and how did that go ?
>
>
So far in our experience, It is backwards compatible. In other words, if you create an app on a system with 1.1 you can compile and run it with 1.1 and higher. However, just as with VFP, you cannot run an app compiled with VS2008 and .net 3.5 on a system that has 1.1 of the framework only installed. The framework must match just like the runtimes in VFP must match (oohh deja vu) :o)
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"