>>>>Since when is NET 'proven' technology ?!? Are you talking about NET 1.1 , or latest 3.5 which is... how old ?
>>>
>>>Are you kidding? .NET is clearly proven technology - it's been around since circa 2000 and used all around the world in a vast number of situations. That is, unless you are looking through VFP tinted glasses.
>>>
>>>It's totally laughable that you can even utter such nonsense.
>>
>>Yes, I was mostly kidding. Now, can you spare me of that kind of attitute and explain what is so 'proven' in technology that changes
>>it's guts every few years apparently to the tune of solutions needing serious rewrites. Are new versions of NET framework backward compatible ? Yes , no, partialy , fully ?
>>
>>I don't do NET yet, but that is what I read. So enlighten me. Do you have all your 1.1 apps upgraded to 3.5 and how did that go ?
>>
>>
>
>So far in our experience, It is backwards compatible. In other words, if you create an app on a system with 1.1 you can compile and run it with 1.1 and higher. However, just as with VFP, you cannot run an app compiled with VS2008 and .net 3.5 on a system that has 1.1 of the framework only installed. The framework must match just like the runtimes in VFP must match (oohh deja vu) :o)

Ok, that sounds like a fair deal. Thks for clarifying.