>>>>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.09affc88c9815310300a92378aed0564.2f1&show_article=1
>>>>
>>>>I don't think nationalized medicine will look so enticing to everyone if this was widely publicized. It certainly has not been in the mass media (yet).
>>>
>>>OTOH my mother has had, over the past few years, treatment that would force a US family into selling their home and/or robbing a bank.
>>>
>>>She's had heart surgery, colostomy (and repaired back to normal), chemotherapy, wee tubes inserted into her tear ducts to counteract the constant weeping as a result of teh chemo, innumerable visits and consultations, et al. And she's in her 70s.
>>>
>>>She's had no complaints about the service or state of teh hospital.
>>
>>Ditto
>>
>>my sons broken arm needing two plates inserted. My fathers treatment after near fatal car crash and triple bypass and now ongoing treatment for chronic emphesema (spelling ?) my mothers knee replacement and ongoing blood pressure treatment. All done excellently and in good hospitals.
>
>Ecco! One can't cite a bad NHS hospital as good reason why they shouldn't have it in the US. Like they'd rather have none, or impossibly expensive care, rather than free. It's like saying "my dog's got to eat best sirloin steak and if all you can offer him is tinned dog food then I'd rather he starve"

But neither option includes starving or going without. The situation here is that medical care is not affordable so many do not go see a dr when they should or even attempt to receive treatment unless it is an emergency. Others use the emergency medical system as a routine dr's office.