>Generally you give up your right to privacy if you choose to make your situation public- which is only fair, so that others can have their version aired as well. In this case all we have is hearsay that an unnamed banking president says his bank did not need TARP money and was threatened with an audit unless he took it. First, it's hearsay. Second, we need context to judge whether he did have a liquidity problem in which case refusal of TARP money justifies an audit.
Well, then, should Napolitano face charges?
http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2009/20090401185152.aspxAlthough I guess he was just like any other journalist who has a source, but no documentation to support the source's claims? I guess that should have been presented as 'unverifiable?' Perhaps it was in the actual interview on air?
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
