>Sorry, I didn't know that this thread is about cars.
>
>I did wonder why you responded to a thread about obeying traffic signals by attempting to connect it to an offensive Nazi death-camp slogan.
>
Your wonderment is totally understandable.

>Do you think that National Socialist German Worker government did not exist?
>
>Do you think the US government is the Socialist German Worker Party?
>
So this thread was about US-made cars only?

>So groceries appear in stores because government mandated it?
>
>I think you've misunderstood again. Groceries appear in stores because everybody from farm to store believes they can drive safely on the roads, provide credit, enforce payment and make a buck. Why do they believe that? Because the majority of society accepts and generally adheres to a system of laws guaranteed by government. When the majority of citizens don't agree, revolution or military despotism generally results.
>
Huh. Do you imply that majority can get their voice heard only through revolutions/coups? What kind of 'safety society' you were talking about?

>I'd recommend that you examine the history of your adopted country for examples of absolute "freedom" leading to banditry and lawlessness. When that happened, 100% of towns sought, welcomed and applauded enforcement of law. QED.
>
I suspect that any time you hear the word 'freedom', it immediately evokes to you images of crazy-eyed people shooting their neighbours. I would recommend that you examine the history of your world. You may find some different examples of the freedom.

>You sound more and more like.marxism science teachers.
>
>All I can suggest is that you look for others' intended meaning rather than trying to inject a different one of your own.

I can just suggest to you that expressing your views on public forum you are inevitably subjected to others evaluation, and when someone walks like a duck, talks like a duck and looks like a duck, then how 'the intended meaning' can change it?