>>>>>>>>>>>>Natural rights of natural minorities.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Isn't it the role of the government to protect the minority?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That being said I will say that I'm happy the will of the California voters was upheld. Far too many times in recent history the California Supreme Court has overturned the votes of the citizenry.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>And what do you mean by "natural rights"7
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Don't you know them? It is written in every country basic laws: rights to talk freely and own property.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>natural minorities ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Don't you know them? It is people looking differently.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Don't be coy Eddie. What do you mean by "Natural rights of natural minorities"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You should combine both my replies to you and you get the answer. It means that every differently looking person has the same rights to talk freely and own property. Did you expect me to shout something about rights to brandish machine-guns and killing neighbors wholesale?
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm just trying to find out what you mean by what you say. What do you mean by natural minorities. ?
>>>>
>>>>It means people looking differently. Should I give you details?
>>>
>>>Yes .That would be helpful.
>>
>>Let say it is a room with 10 smart people and one idiot. That's the example. No one will strip the idiot off his property.
>
>So you are happy with same sex relationships being given them same protection as mixed sex relationships. (provided they are intelligent. But we can take that seprately if you like)

I don't quite understand what you said, but if you mean legal protection then everyone has the same legal protection. Marriage does not provide additional legal protection. To be precise it downgrades individual legal protection. Any individual person has the same rights as married person and if he wants he may legally delegate rights to any other person (or group of them) to imitate 100% spousal legal relations.