>Don't you believe there is such a thing as inalienable rights, not limited to U.S. citizens or narrowly defined by U.S. statutes? I do.
>
>"Narrowly-defined"????? ROFLMAO!!!!!
>
>This sounds like the same kind of rhetoric that characterized "history of paying bills, steady income" as "arbitrary and unreasonable" credit standards. <s>

OK, leave out the word "narrowly." My point remains the same.