>I hope you're very sincere with those donations and that you don't do it just to look good to others. Some people do that you know.
>
>is based upon some sort of personal experience. If you think that many people are insincere and just want to look good to others (i.e., they are phony), it must be because you have had experience with this sort of person. It would never occur to me to say such a thing about anyone who contributes to a charity because the people that I associate with are simply not like that.

No matter how you defend this I'm sure you know it doesn't make sense. It's not because someone talks about something that that person experienced it. Or that I can't make comments about something because I never did something related to it.

I never wrote a book so I can't make comment on a given topic not related to writing books? Please explain that one to me.

I just got in this discussion to tell you that the Canadian health system is not that bad and this degenerate rather fast to you saying that I am stupid.

>You are entitled to your opinion and if you think that I am aggressive and ignorant, that is your prerogative. However, there is a big difference between being aggresive and assertive. At least ignorance can be fixed - stupidity can't.

English is not my first language but please tell me where you meant that it's my ideas that are stupid and that that was not directed at me? Is the word ideas implied somewhere?