>From your answer I draw the conclusion that you oppose any type of prostitution, even what you call the extreme case of a handicapped person who seeks sexual relief. That's a fundamental position. I guess it's your right to take that stance, but not many (here at least) will agree with you and if you'd be the dictator, you'd cause a lot of frustration in certain groups of men. You'd say to those men: Get over it, you won't die of not having sex. You say that far too easy. I also suspect that not-having-any-sex is not one of your own problems. Who are you to decide for other persons what they must endure in this? Isn't the desire for having sex a fundamental drive?! How about the amount of rape? Don't you think it would increase if there were no prostitutes?

Why do you keep excluding women from the pool of people in need of sex? Are gigolos somehow substantially different from their female coworkers?